Wiktionnaire:Bots/Statut/WikitanvirBot
- Nom du propriétaire : Wikitanvir
- But du bot : Inter-wiki
- Script utilisé : Pywikipedia's interwiki.py
- Déjà présent sur, avec statut de bot : On 200+ wikis, see here
- Déjà présent sur, sans statut de bot : On rest of the global bot wikis
- Remarques : The bot will add/remove/modify inte-wiki links
- Date et heure : 14 avril 2011 à 02:16 (UTC)
Le vote est ouvert à tous ceux qui ont au moins 100 modifications sur le Wiktionnaire francophone au moment du début du vote. Il est rappelé aux votants que le seul avantage du statut de bot est de ne pas apparaître dans la page Modifications récentes. Si le rapport Pour/Contre est supérieur (ou égal) à 75%, la requête est acceptée, le bot flag est demandé aux bureaucrates. Le vote dure 7 jours.
Pour
Pour High trust. -- Quentinv57 ✍ 14 avril 2011 à 14:42 (UTC)- Pour la gestion de ce robot a l'air satisfaisante vis à vis de l'apostrophe. Stephane8888 ✍ 17 avril 2011 à 15:45 (UTC)
- Pour en effet pywikipedia publie régulièrement des correctifs. JackPotte ($♠) 18 avril 2011 à 18:01 (UTC)
Contre
Neutre
Discussion
- Can I start the test edits now? Wikitanvir 14 avril 2011 à 02:16 (UTC)
- Yes please, I hope that you're aware about the cs.wikt policy (they put their expressions with some capital letters and points, so the links are not the pagename). JackPotte ($♠) 14 avril 2011 à 11:11 (UTC)
- Hello, first of all, it's doing the test edits now. I will stop it after around 30 edits. And I don't know about that policy. I think Pywikipediabot has options for that, so it will be safe. Wikitanvir 14 avril 2011 à 18:06 (UTC)
- As far as I know, interwiki.py has never been really properly adapted to the Wiktionary family for at least the following reasons:
- The cs.wikt specificities.
- The different apostrophes according to the site language (for example en:aujourd'hui is pointing to a redirection here, the script may remove them, and sometimes there isn't any one).
- Only two bots arrived to do that for a few years: en:User:Interwicket/code, and Luckas-bot at the third vote.
- JackPotte ($♠) 14 avril 2011 à 18:33 (UTC)
- I think you are not quite right. You said Luckas's bot is okay, but see here his user-config.py, which has fr and cs wikt in it, and he uses the same interwiki.py from Pywikipedia. As it is okay, as my test edits seem okay, I see no problem. Wikitanvir 14 avril 2011 à 20:25 (UTC)
- Also previously flagged ArthurBot, it runs in interwiki.py too. No customization in script. :) Wikitanvir 14 avril 2011 à 20:33 (UTC)
- I am done with test and stopped the bot from working here. I hope edits are okay. Wikitanvir 15 avril 2011 à 04:03 (UTC)
- As this discussion is similar to en:Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-04/User:WikitanvirBot, I propose to grow it over there. JackPotte ($♠) 16 avril 2011 à 09:43 (UTC)
- No, sorry. enwikt and frwikt are different communities and this vote is about giving WikitanvirBot a bot status on frwikt and not anywhere else.
- I have checked all edits done by WikitanvirBot localy, and as I expected everything is okay. -- Quentinv57 ✍ 16 avril 2011 à 11:57 (UTC)
- I didn't ask to vote on en.wikt, just to avoid to paste two times the same things. JackPotte ($♠) 16 avril 2011 à 14:03 (UTC)
- As this discussion is similar to en:Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-04/User:WikitanvirBot, I propose to grow it over there. JackPotte ($♠) 16 avril 2011 à 09:43 (UTC)
- I am done with test and stopped the bot from working here. I hope edits are okay. Wikitanvir 15 avril 2011 à 04:03 (UTC)
- As far as I know, interwiki.py has never been really properly adapted to the Wiktionary family for at least the following reasons:
- Hello, first of all, it's doing the test edits now. I will stop it after around 30 edits. And I don't know about that policy. I think Pywikipediabot has options for that, so it will be safe. Wikitanvir 14 avril 2011 à 18:06 (UTC)
- Yes please, I hope that you're aware about the cs.wikt policy (they put their expressions with some capital letters and points, so the links are not the pagename). JackPotte ($♠) 14 avril 2011 à 11:11 (UTC)
Est-ce que ce robot gère correctement les apostrophes ? (en:aujourd'hui is pointing to a redirection here) Je n'ai pas vu de tel exemple dans les contributions de test. Stephane8888 ✍ 16 avril 2011 à 17:40 (UTC)
- Though I don't understand your question good, but I think my bot can differ these two kinds of apostrophes. In Bengali, we have this kind of differences too. Please see here for a prove. Wikitanvir 17 avril 2011 à 06:05 (UTC)
- And, if we run the command without -wiktionary parameter, it will modify the inter-wiki to the redirected page, and place the inter-wiki to the existing page. But if we run with -wiktionary (and I run it with that parameter), it will simply ignore that page with a message, "Ignoring fr:aujourd’hui for aujourd'hui in wiktionary mode." I think you are okay with this. Wikitanvir 17 avril 2011 à 07:02 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanations. I think I'm okay with this. Stephane8888 ✍ 17 avril 2011 à 15:48 (UTC)
Résultat
Avec un peu de retard, le statut est accordé. Stephane8888 ✍ 27 avril 2011 à 09:51 (UTC)